The Nuremberg Code & Mandatory Vaccinations

"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of earth. This very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be “cured” against one’s will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals."

C.S. Lewis, God in the Dock: Essays on Theology (Making of Modern Theology)

An open letter to all governments considering mandatory vaccination for SARS-CoV-2

We suggest you consider very carefully the steps you are taking with regard to your policies and actions as they relate to COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2, specifically the idea of mandatory vaccinations.

Note: by mandatory we include the carrot and stick approach of excluding non-participants from essential services (including but not limited to financial services, transportation, employment, health and social welfare, state benefits etc.) effectively turning vaccine status into a short-cut toward a Chinese-style social credit digital identity system of citizen control.

We also recommend you reconsider the role of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation both in terms of "academic" funding and policy formation in the context of its global public health track record and Gates' openly stated population control agenda.  

The long term health benefits of any treatment or vaccination cannot be determined as safe until long-term multi-year trials have been conducted. Without which, you are literally conducting an experiment (with no placebo double blind controls) on the entire population. If this is to be done, the consent of the participants in this experiment (without sanction or coercion) is absolutely essential as laid out in the Nuremberg Code (you can see the full guidelines here):

The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.

This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

You may think the conjugation of Bill Gates (and by implication a government's "policy" agenda) with the Nuremberg trials is hyperbolic. But let's consider a brief overview of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's track record - often using the WHO in a legitimising (and administrative) role to carry out its vaccination, population control and digital identity agenda.

As recently quoted in the Italian parliament by Italian MP Sara Cunial:

Gates said, I quote exactly from his speech:  “If we do a good job on vaccines, health and reproduction, we can reduce the world population by 10-15%.”  (the full context of this quote is outlined here).

She went on to say:

With his vaccines, Gates managed to sterilize millions of women in Africa. Gates caused a polio epidemic that paralyzed 500,000 children in India and still today with DTP, Gates causes more deaths than the disease itself. And he does the same with GMOs designed by Monsanto and “generously donated” to needy populations. All this while he is already thinking about distributing the quantum tattoo for vaccination recognition and mRNA vaccines as tools for reprogramming our immune system. In addition, Gates also does business with several multinationals that own 5G facilities in the USA.

Here's a more complete list of the crimes against humanity committed by Bill Gates, as summarised (here with sources) by Robert Kennedy Jr (Chairman, Children’s Health Defense, April 09, 2020):

Gates’ Vaccine Agenda: A Win-Win for Pharma & Mandatory Vaccination

Vaccines, for Bill Gates, are a strategic philanthropy that feed his many vaccine-related businesses (including Microsoft’s ambition to control a global vaccination ID enterprise) and give him dictatorial control of global health policy.

Gates’ obsession with vaccines seems to be fueled by a conviction to save the world with technology.

Promising his share of $450 million of $1.2 billion to eradicate polio, Gates took control of India’s National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization (NTAGI), which mandated up to 50 doses (Table 1) of polio vaccines through overlapping immunization programs to children before the age of five. Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP) epidemic that paralyzed 490,000 children beyond expected rates between 2000 and 2017. In 2017, the Indian government dialed back Gates’ vaccine regimen and asked Gates and his vaccine policies to leave India. NPAFP rates dropped precipitously.

In 2017, the World Health Organization (WHO) reluctantly admitted that the global explosion in polio is predominantly vaccine strain. The most frightening epidemics in Congo, Afghanistan, and the Philippines, are all linked to vaccines. In fact, by 2018, 70% of global polio cases were vaccine strain.

In 2009, the Gates Foundation funded tests of experimental HPV vaccines, developed by Glaxo Smith Kline (GSK) and Merck, on 23,000 young girls in remote Indian provinces. Approximately 1,200 suffered severe side effects, including autoimmune and fertility disorders. Seven died. Indian government investigations charged that Gates-funded researchers committed pervasive ethical violations: pressuring vulnerable village girls into the trial, bullying parents, forging consent forms, and refusing medical care to the injured girls. The case is now in the country’s Supreme Court.

In 2010, the Gates Foundation funded a phase 3 trial of GSK’s experimental malaria vaccine, killing 151 African infants and causing serious adverse effects, including paralysis, seizure, and febrile convulsions, to 1,048 of the 5,949 children.

During Gates’ 2002 MenAfriVac campaign in Sub-Saharan Africa, Gates’ operatives forcibly vaccinated thousands of African children against meningitis. Approximately 50 of the 500 children vaccinated developed paralysis. South African newspapers complained, “We are guinea pigs for the drug makers.” Nelson Mandela’s former senior economist, Professor Patrick Bond, describes Gates’ philanthropic practices as “ruthless and immoral.”

In 2010, when Gates committed $10 billion to the WHO, he said  “We must make this the decade of vaccines.” A month later, Gates said in a TED Talk that new vaccines “could reduce population.” And, four years later, in 2014, Kenya’s Catholic Doctors Association accused the WHO of chemically sterilizing millions of unwilling Kenyan women with a  “tetanus” vaccine campaign. Independent labs found a sterility formula in every vaccine tested. After denying the charges, WHO finally admitted it had been developing the sterility vaccines for over a decade.  Similar accusations came from Tanzania, Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines.

A 2017 study (Morgenson et. al. 2017) showed that WHO’s popular DTP vaccine is killing more African children than the diseases it prevents. DTP-vaccinated girls suffered 10x the death rate of children who had not yet received the vaccine. WHO has refused to recall the lethal vaccine, which it forces upon tens of millions of African children annually.

Global public health advocates around the world accuse Gates of steering WHO’s agenda away from the projects that are proven to curb infectious diseases: clean water, hygiene, nutrition, and economic development. The Gates Foundation spends only about $650 million of its $5 billion dollar budget on these areas. They say he has diverted agency resources to serve his personal philosophy that good health only comes in a syringe.

In addition to using his philanthropy to control WHO, UNICEF, GAVI, and PATH, Gates funds a private pharmaceutical company that manufactures vaccines and is donating $50 million to 12 pharmaceutical companies to speed up development of a coronavirus vaccine. In his recent media appearances, Gates appears confident that the Covid-19 crisis will now give him the opportunity to force his dictatorial vaccine programs on all American children – and adults.

"The victims of these crimes are numbered in the hundreds of thousands" (Nuremberg Trials)

Recently we celebrated VE day in the UK. Are government officials in the UK, Europe and the United States seriously considering ripping up The Nuremberg Code and forcing their citizens to take part in medical experiments (a crime for which Nazi doctors were executed)?

Brigadier General Telford Taylor was Chief of Counsel during the Nuremberg "Doctors Trial", he said the following in the opening statement by the prosecution:

"The defendants in this case are charged with murders, tortures, and other atrocities committed in the name of medical science. The victims of these crimes are numbered in the hundreds of thousands. A handful only are still alive; a few of the survivors will appear in this courtroom. But most of these miserable victims were slaughtered outright or died in the course of the tortures to which they were subjected. For the most part they are nameless dead. To their murderers, these wretched people were not individuals at all. They came in wholesale lots and were treated worse than animals."

After almost 140 days of proceedings, including the testimony of 85 witnesses and the submission of almost 1,500 documents, the American judges pronounced their verdict on August 20, 1947. Sixteen of the doctors were found guilty. Seven were sentenced to death. They were executed on June 2, 1948  (source).

The Nuremberg Code was written precisely because governments (whether they believe what they are doing is morally righteous or not - see the quote from CS Lewis above) have the power of coercion and unless restrained are able to force individuals against their will to participate in activities (which in the case of vaccines, without long-term observation and data, will be experimental by definition) that are potentially detrimental to their well-being (see sources and resources below). The Nuremberg Code of ethics was designed as a barrier to outright authoritarianism in the medical realm; choosing to ignore it would be "crossing the Rubicon" and in so doing you would eschew any semblance of democratic legitimacy.

Bill Gates, via his various proxies, has conducted what can only be described as mass experiments on ill-informed subjects with often no or at best dubious consent. The numbers of dead, paralysed and sterilised humans he has left in his wake is on a scale that is industrial and one that mirrors the horrifying efficiency and disregard for life and well-being of those tried at Nuremberg. Rather than carrying out his vaccine (population control, digital ID) agenda, any responsible government would be calling for his arrest and prosecution.

Voluntary consent was consciously positioned at the heart of the Nuremberg code for good reason. Be warned, attempting to run roughshod over this ethical code puts you in very dangerous company.

In the UK (and mirrored globally), the BBC, Guardian, Imperial College all receive substantial funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. However, the public are far more informed than you think and do not rely on these "news" and "academic" resources for their comprehension.

The idea of mandatory vaccinations (experimental or not, coerced via social and/or financial incentive or not) clearly violates the ethical premise of the Nuremberg Code and is an afront to all those who suffered at the hands of the Nazi Doctors and to the hundreds of thousands of nameless and voiceless victims of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.  

Perhaps most importantly, the entire premise for Bill Gates "population control agenda" as outlined by Bill Gates has been widely debunked in academic circles (NASA, NOAA, Princeton, Harvard, the Royal Meteorological Society, the American Geophysical Union and many others, see Top 10 Climate Studies), if not yet in the mainstream media outlets that Gates in part sponsors.  

What Could Possibly Go Wrong?

A software monopolist who knows nothing about the climate or the innate and adaptive immune system wants to forcibly re-code subjects RNA with an experimental vaccine based on science contradicted by NASA, NOAA, Princeton, Harvard, RMS, AGU, SLAC, and many others. A brief look at this monopolist's track record shows quite clearly "what could possibly go wrong".

We trust the words and sentiments of C.S. Lewis and Brigadier General Telford Taylor are comprehensible to the current crop of politicians around the world whose policies eerily echo the agendas of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation; a "coincidence" not lost on the populations they are supposed to represent and serve. 

Resources & Sources